home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
kermit.columbia.edu.tar
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
newsgroups
/
misc.20020314-20021006
/
000007_xms656@hotmail.com_Tue Apr 2 11:17:57 EST 2002.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
2002-10-06
|
1KB
|
25 lines
Article: 13276 of comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Path: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!panix!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: xms656@hotmail.com (Computer)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Kermit vs FTP
Date: 1 Apr 2002 20:53:32 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <5b90c2d0.0204012053.6247528@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 210.84.182.137
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1017723213 26274 127.0.0.1 (2 Apr 2002 04:53:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Apr 2002 04:53:33 GMT
Xref: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:13276
Hi, I am a university student who downloads many files for my course
>from many ifferent places on the internet and the uni's own servers.
Now, everyone keeps telling me things such as FTP is quick and Kermit
is slow or Kermit is good and FTP is garbage, and so forth...
Can anyone tell me what are their main differences (features?) and/or
what is the same about them to clear things up for me?